| |
CLOSURE
COMPATIBILITY AND TORQUE PROBLEMS | INDUCTION SEALING PROBLEMS
CLOSURE COMPATIBILITY AND TORQUE PROBLEMS
1. Container Dimensions Compatibility with
Closure Dimensions.
T & E dimension of the bottle and cap.
Too far apart will cause the closure thread to override the bottle
thread and “strip off” the cap. Too close on dimensions
will cause drag, which would give a false reading to automatic capping
equipment, therefore not enough application torque.
Thread styles and threads per inch.
“L” style has a 30-degree thread contact surface and
“M” style has a 10-degree thread contact surface. Thread
per inch is the number of turns of the thread that would be found
if the container neck were extended to a full inch. Matching thread
styles and threads per inch insures a better fit.
H dimension of the bottle and cap.
H stands for height. If the H is too short on the bottle, the cap
can bottom out on the bottle and not have enough thread turns for
a good seal. It would create false reading for application torque
to an automatic capping machine.
Mismatched S dimensions.
If S dimensions are mismatched, it can cause cocked caps or not
enough turns of the thread for good retention of the application
torque.
2. Proper Application Torque.
What is the proper amount of torque?
Various organizations have published suggested application torque
charts. What is common among all of the recommendations are the
values are grouped by closure size and are listed as a range of
inch-pounds. A “rule of thumb” is to divide the closure
by 2; i.e. 38mm is 19 in./lbs. See Reliable Caps suggested Torque
Values.
Measuring application torque.
Unless the capping equipment records the measurements, which is
not that common, application torque is recorded off line by measuring
removal torque. Removal torque needs to be measured immediately
after capping and before heat induction, if used. The reading should
be 40% to 60% of the application torque.
Variables affecting torque:
• Cleanliness of the fill.
• Temperature of closure and container at time of fill.
• Lining materials and container materials.
• Dimensions (as discussed in 1).
• Capping equipment process control capability.
• Heat induction sealing.
• Quality of container finish: sealing land area.
• Storage conditions including temperature, relative humidity
and static top load.
3. Common Problems Related to Application
Torque.
Below standard application torque.
• Not enough stress to hold the closure in place. Becomes
“loose in handling and transporting.
• Not enough pressure on sealing land area of bottle. Leaking.
Non-bonding of heat induction liners.
Above standard application torque.
• Stress cracking of thermoplastic closures.
• Distortion of the closure creating uneven pressure on the
land area which can cause leaking.
• Friction between the bottle land area and the liner in the
closure can wrinkle the liner, which damages the seal. Even slight
wrinkles in heatseal liners can create “pin holes” in
the facing layer after heat induction.
Heat induction process.
The process of heat induction causes the bottle and cap to expand
and shrink. Because these two items are usually made of different
thermoplastics, and the timing and the rates of change are different,
the torque is changed during the process. If a tightly closed bottle
is required, it is recommended to re-torque the closure after heat
induction.
Back to Top
INDUCTION SEALING PROBLEMS
There are a few common problems sometimes encountered with induction
heat sealing liners. The following list is designed to help you
determine the problem(s) and the possible cause(s).
PROBLEM
|
POSSIBLE CAUSE
|
| Not Sealing |
• Wrong material for application
• Insufficient application torque
• Product on the bottle's land area
• Capping problem
• Induction unit malfunction
• Induction unit settings
|
| Partially Sealing |
• Insufficient application torque
• Product on the bottle's land area
• Capping problem
• Dimensional conflict between closure and bottle
• Insufficient energy setting on induction unit
• Incorrect head coil position
• Off-set liner
• Bottle land area quality issue
• Insufficient land area on bottle (Min. = .085)
|
| High Removal Torque |
• Excessive application torque
• Material back-bonding to closure
• Incomplete wax absorption
• Excessive energy setting
• Oversize cut edge
|
| Low Removal Torque |
• Insufficient application torque
• Bottle finish melt down
• Dimensional conflict between closure and bottle
• Excessive dwell time within induction field
|
| Incomplete Wax Absorption |
• Insufficient energy setting
• Insufficient dwell time within induction field
• Incorrect head coil position
• Product fill temperature
• Hot melt adhesive failure
• Product in contact with foil
• Coil too narrow for closure diameter
|
| Foil Corrosion |
• Wrong material for application
• Excessive energy setting
• Excessive dwell time within induction field
• Product on container land area
|
| Back Bonding to Closure |
• Excessive energy setting
• Incorrect backing for application
• Melt point conflict between backing and closure |
Back to Top
|